The tribunal's three-man panel, presided over by Justice Francesca Nnong-Isoni, announced the decision to reserve judgment following the adoption of final written addresses by the parties involved.
The legal battle revolves around the outcome of the polls conducted in March, with Mr Mohammed contesting the victory secured by Mr Kudu of the APC. During the proceedings, Edidiong Usungurua, the counsel representing the petitioner, indicated that all arguments had been presented and reiterated in the written address.
Mr Usungurua urged the tribunal to nullify the election results for the Nassarawa-Eggon East constituency on the grounds of alleged non-compliance with the Electoral Act.
On the opposing side, Ishaku Dikko (SAN), the counsel for Mr Kudu, the assembly member, also adopted his written address and called on the tribunal to dismiss the petition, asserting its lack of merit.
Additionally, Sunday Akoh, who represented the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as the third respondent, echoed the sentiment of dismissal. Mr Akoh asserted that INEC had diligently adhered to legal procedures and the Electoral Act in returning the assembly member.
Justice Nnong-Isoni noted that the judgment's announcement date would be communicated to the involved parties, underscoring the tribunal's commitment to a thorough review of the case before rendering a decision.
The outcome of this legal contest holds significant implications for the political landscape of the Nassarawa-Eggon East constituency and the representation of its constituents in the State House of Assembly.
As anticipation builds around the tribunal's forthcoming judgment, stakeholders await the resolution of this electoral dispute that has engaged the attention of legal experts and the local community alike.